Pragmatic Trial of Metformin for Glucose Intolerance or Increased BMI in Prostate Cancer Patients

Purpose

Metformin is used widely in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. It has off-label indications for use in the prevention of diabetes and in hyperinsulinar obesity. In medical practices, the implementation of metformin for these off-label indications is variable, often at the level of the provider. Multiple retrospective investigations have also shown a clinical benefit in men with prostate cancer who are incidentally treated with metformin. This pragmatic study will test the feasibility of enrolling patients who have glucose intolerance (as defined by HbA1c of 5.7-6.4%) and/or who have increased BMI (BMI greater than or equal to 25 kg/m2) to a randomized pragmatic study of metformin plus lifestyle modification information versus lifestyle modification information only. For purposes of the scope of this project and the study's feasibility, this will be implemented in a group of prostate cancer patients, who may have additional benefits from metformin.

Condition

  • Prostate Cancer

Eligibility

Eligible Ages
Over 18 Years
Eligible Sex
Male
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

In order to be eligible to participate in this study, an individual must meet all of the following criteria. The patients will be screening for eligibility and offered an electronic consent via the Epic medical record and the patient portal (My Health Connection - MHC) or otherwise through Epic: 1. Provision to sign and date the consent form in MHC or otherwise via Epic. 2. Subjects must have an MHC Account to participate in the study 3. Be a male aged ≥18 years of age on day of signing the informed consent. 4. Impaired glucose tolerance and/or overweight, and appropriate to receive metformin, meeting at least one of the following in the last year (timing relative to the consent presentation not start of therapy): - HbA1c of 5.7 - 6.4 % - BMI≥25 kg/m^2 5. Have a prostate cancer diagnosis 6. Have a clinical relationship with a participating provider at a UCHealth facility.

Exclusion Criteria

  1. On therapy for diabetes including any of the following alone or in combination medications (diet controlled or managed diabetes is allowed - e.g. diagnosis of Diabetes, but without an active prescription for anti-glycemic medication): 1. Metformin 2. Insulin 3. Glipizide 4. Glyburide 5. Glimepiride 6. Pioglitazone 7. Rosiglitazone 8. Sitagliptin 9. Saxagliptin 10. Linagliptin 11. Alogliptin 12. Canagliflozin 13. Dapagliflozin 14. Empagliflozin 15. Ertugliflozin 16. Liraglutide 17. Dulaglutide 18. Semaglutide 19. Exenatide 20. Lixisenatide 21. Nateglinide 22. Repaglinide 23. Tirzepatide 2. Contraindication for metformin use which include any of the following which are exclusionary (in Epic will use most recent lab values): 1. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of < 50 ml/minute (calculated according to the formula utilized within Epic). 2. Known Total Bilirubin ≥3 mg/dL) 3. Diagnosis of fibrosis or cirrhosis of the liver (ICD10: K74) 4. Diagnosis of alcohol related disorders (ICD10: F10) 5. Metformin allergy in Epic (ICD10: T50.995A) 3. Non-English-speaking patient until Spanish language consent form and relevant materials can be made available. Due to the novel aspect of this trial, we plan to get some experience in treating approximately the first 50 patients, make any changes needed in the study operations and then implement a Spanish consent, as feasible. 4. Taking any medication with a known class D or higher drug interaction with metformin, including: 1. Cimetidine 2. Dolutegravir 3. Patiromer 4. Ranolazine 5. Tafenoquine 5. The use of any carbonic anhydrase inhibitors since they are a risk factor for lactic acidosis, including: 1. Topiramate 2. Dichlorphenamide 3. Acetazolamide 4. Methazolamide 5. Dorzolamide 6. Brinzolamide 7. Dichlorphenamide 8. Sultiame 9. Zonisamide 10. Indisulam 6. Any treating investigator concern, related to tolerance, safety, adherence or for any other reason

Study Design

Phase
Early Phase 1
Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description
In this pragmatic trial, a 2-step electronic consent approach to enroll patients in the metformin + lifestyle modification or lifestyle modification arms will be used. The initial consent will invite patients to join a cohort to study prostate cancer and it will describe the general pragmatic framework under which this protocol will take place with the opportunity for additional trial opportunities. Subsequent consents will be limited to those who consented to the initial project and are found to be eligible for a specific trial (e.g. this metformin/lifestyle intervention trial). Within the framework of this pragmatic trial and electronic self-consent, these subsequent consents will be more focused and limited to the specific involvement in the arm in which they have been randomized. This general approach will follow the trials within cohorts paradigm.
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None (Open Label)

Arm Groups

ArmDescriptionAssigned Intervention
Active Comparator
Metformin and Lifestyle Modification Arm
For the metformin arm: metformin will be obtained as a standard of care medication from the patient's general pharmacy. This will be given for a clinical indication (e.g. prediabetes or overweight/obese). It will not be supplied by the study, but billed to Medicare, self pay or 3rd party payer. Lifestyle modification and prediabetes information will be provided via MHC or other electronic means on a quarterly basis.
  • Drug: Metformin
    Metformin is a medication used to treat type 2 diabetes, gestational diabetes, and prediabetes. In this study, patients on the Metformin arm will be started on 850 mg daily for 2 weeks, then escalated to a final dose of 850 mg twice daily, which is lower than the maximum recommended dose of 2550 mg total daily.
    Other names:
    • Glucophage
    • Riomet
    • Glumetza
  • Behavioral: Lifestyle Modification
    Patients randomized to this arm will receive standard lifestyle modification recommendations. This will include the general recommendation to increase exercise level mildly, after discussing with the medical provider. There is a potential low-level risk in increasing one's exercise levels. Here are some examples of the educational material from the American Diabetes Association website, and topics will be rotated on quarterly basis: Healthy eating: https://www.diabetes.org/nutrition/healthy-food-choices-made-easy Prediabetes: https://www.diabetes.org/diabetes-risk/prediabetes Fitness: https://www.diabetes.org/fitness/get-and-stay-fit Weight loss: https://www.diabetes.org/fitness/weight-loss
Placebo Comparator
Lifestyle Modification Only Arm
Patients randomized to this arm will receive standard lifestyle modification recommendations. This will include the general recommendation to increase exercise level mildly, after discussing with the medical provider. There is a potential low-level risk in increasing one's exercise levels.
  • Behavioral: Lifestyle Modification
    Patients randomized to this arm will receive standard lifestyle modification recommendations. This will include the general recommendation to increase exercise level mildly, after discussing with the medical provider. There is a potential low-level risk in increasing one's exercise levels. Here are some examples of the educational material from the American Diabetes Association website, and topics will be rotated on quarterly basis: Healthy eating: https://www.diabetes.org/nutrition/healthy-food-choices-made-easy Prediabetes: https://www.diabetes.org/diabetes-risk/prediabetes Fitness: https://www.diabetes.org/fitness/get-and-stay-fit Weight loss: https://www.diabetes.org/fitness/weight-loss

Recruiting Locations

Colorado Research Center
Aurora 5412347, Colorado 5417618 80045
Contact:
Marjorie McIntyre
303-724-5868
marjorie.mcintyre@cuanschutz.edu

UCHealth-Southern Colorado
Colorado Springs 5417598, Colorado 5417618 80863
Contact:
Elizabeth Graf
elizabeth.graf@uchealth.org

UCHealth-Metro Denver
Denver 5419384, Colorado 5417618 80217-3364
Contact:
Marjorie McIntyre
303-724-5868
marjorie.mcintyre@cuanschutz.edu

UCHealth-Northern Colorado
Fort Collins 5577147, Colorado 5417618 80521
Contact:
Sara Twombly
970-491-1553
sara.twombly@uchealth.org

More Details

Status
Recruiting
Sponsor
University of Colorado, Denver

Study Contact

Emily Buchanan
303-724-5912
emily.buchanan@cuanschutz.edu

Detailed Description

In this study, subjects with prostate cancer will be randomized to metformin plus educational material for lifestyle modification versus educational material for lifestyle modification alone and followed for up to 10 years. Population-based, retrospective studies have reported improved outcomes, including prostate cancer specific mortality, with the incidental use of metformin in prostate cancer patients. One prominent study is this area from Margel, et al was published in 2013.2 Using the administrative database from several Ontario health districts, men aged 66 with incidental diabetes and prostate cancer antigen (PCA) were studied. The study included over 3000 men and found an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.76 (95% CI, 0.64 to 0.89) for PCA-specific mortality for each additional 6 months of metformin use. There was no relationship to survival with any other diabetic medication. In addition to the use of metformin for the prevention of metabolic complications related to obesity and the prevention of diabetes, there are several studies reporting a potential benefit in those with prostate cancer. In a Veterans Administration-based study, more than 87,000 subjects were identified with PCA in the sample.3 The subjects were analyzed in 3 cohorts: 1) no diabetic medication (DM), 2) DM without metformin use and 3) DM with metformin use. Men with DM who were treated with metformin were found to have improved OS (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.78 - 0.86, for mortality) compared to men with DM not on metformin. Reduced cancer specific mortality was also observed in the men with DM on metformin (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.64 -0.77) in comparison to men with DM not taking metformin (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.85 -1.00) - the reference group were those without DM. Despite considerable interest in these findings, there is little if any prospective data on the use of metformin in this setting.