Purpose

This study will evaluate and compare the quality of adipose (fat) tissue harvested using different liposuction technologies and aspiration methods. Each participant will serve as their own control, with paired fat samples collected from anatomically matched treatment areas. The study will evaluate adipocyte viability and other characteristics of the harvested tissue, including viable adipocyte density, stromal vascular fraction, metabolic activity, and fat composition. The goal of the study is to better understand how different liposuction technologies and aspiration methods affect the quality and characteristics of harvested adipose tissue.

Condition

Eligibility

Eligible Ages
Between 30 Years and 65 Years
Eligible Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • Male or female aged 30 to 65 years, inclusive. - Planned elective liposuction/body contouring procedure involving two or more anatomical areas (e.g., arms, abdomen, flanks, thighs, and/or back) with sufficient distribution to permit collection of paired adipose tissue samples from contralateral or anatomically matched treatment areas. - Investigator determines the subject is an appropriate candidate for the planned procedure and study participation. - Adequate adipose tissue is present to permit collection of required paired fat samples without impacting the planned surgical outcome. - Able to understand and sign the informed consent form. - Willing and able to comply with study requirements. - If applicable, female subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test on the day of procedure.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Prior liposuction or surgical intervention in the planned treatment areas that, in the opinion of the investigator, may affect adipose tissue characteristics or study assessments. - Prior treatment of the planned treatment areas with energy-based devices (e.g., ultrasound, radiofrequency, laser) that, in the opinion of the investigator, may affect adipose tissue characteristics or study assessments. - Significant skin laxity, fibrosis, scarring, or other abnormal tissue characteristics in the planned treatment areas that could impact fat harvest quality or comparability between sites. - Current smoker or use of nicotine-containing products within 4 weeks prior to the procedure. - Known metabolic or systemic conditions that may affect adipose tissue biology or wound healing, including but not limited to: - uncontrolled diabetes mellitus - significant vascular disease - connective tissue disorders - Use of medications known to significantly affect fat metabolism, tissue healing, or inflammatory response, including: - chronic systemic corticosteroids - immunosuppressive therapies - GLP-1 receptor agonists (e.g., semaglutide, tirzepatide) within 4 weeks prior to the procedure - Active local or systemic infection at the time of the procedure. - Known coagulopathy or use of anticoagulant therapy that cannot be safely discontinued prior to surgery. - Pregnant or breastfeeding subjects. - Body mass index (BMI) outside the range of 20-35 kg/m², inclusive. - Inadequate adipose tissue volume or distribution to permit paired sample collection from contralateral or anatomically matched areas. - Participation in another interventional clinical study that, in the opinion of the investigator, could interfere with study endpoints. - Any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would make the subject unsuitable for participation or could confound study results.

Study Design

Phase
N/A
Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description
Participants are assigned to one of two comparison arms. Within each arm, paired adipose tissue samples are collected from anatomically matched treatment areas, with each participant serving as their own control.
Primary Purpose
Basic Science
Masking
None (Open Label)
Masking Description
There is no indication in the protocol that participants, investigators/care providers, or outcome assessors are masked. The device/treatment being used is known during the procedure.

Arm Groups

ArmDescriptionAssigned Intervention
Active Comparator
Ultrasound-Assisted Liposuction Comparison
AYON ultrasound-assisted liposuction (UAL) is compared with VASER ultrasound-assisted liposuction using paired adipose tissue samples collected from anatomically matched treatment areas. The primary outcome is the paired difference in adipocyte viability, with additional evaluation of adipose tissue characteristics.
  • Device: AYON Ultrasound-Assisted Liposuction System
    Ultrasound-assisted liposuction using the AYON UAL system. In this arm, AYON UAL is compared with VASER ultrasound-assisted liposuction using paired adipose tissue samples collected from anatomically matched treatment areas. Study-specific UAL settings and treatment parameters are defined by the protocol.
    Other names:
    • AYON UAL System
    • AYON
  • Device: VASER Ultrasound-Assisted Liposuction System
    Ultrasound-assisted liposuction using the VASER system. In this arm, VASER is compared with AYON ultrasound-assisted liposuction using paired adipose tissue samples collected from anatomically matched treatment areas. Study-specific UAL settings and treatment parameters are defined by the protocol.
    Other names:
    • VASER
Active Comparator
Aspiration Modality Comparison
AYON power-assisted liposuction (PL) using a peristaltic pump is compared with vacuum aspiration using paired adipose tissue samples collected from anatomically matched treatment areas. The primary outcome is the paired difference in adipocyte viability, with additional exploratory evaluation of adipose tissue characteristics.
  • Device: AYON Power-Assisted Liposuction System
    Power-assisted liposuction using the AYON PL system with a peristaltic pump. In this arm, the peristaltic pump aspiration modality is compared with vacuum aspiration using paired adipose tissue samples collected from anatomically matched treatment areas.
    Other names:
    • AYON PL
    • AYON PL System
  • Device: Vacuum Aspiration
    Vacuum aspiration used for adipose tissue harvest in the power-assisted liposuction comparison. In this arm, vacuum aspiration is compared with AYON power-assisted liposuction using a peristaltic pump through paired adipose tissue samples collected from anatomically matched treatment areas.

Recruiting Locations

Mentor Plastic Surgery
Concord, Ohio 44077
Contact:
Petula Kelly
440-205-5750
petula@paulvanekmd.com

Pearl Plastic Surgery
Olympia, Washington 98506
Contact:
Shauna Smith-Ewers
360-878-9300
shauna@pearlplasticsurgery.com

More Details

Status
Recruiting
Sponsor
Apyx Medical

Study Contact

Global Senior Director, Clinical Affairs
1-800-537-2790
research@apyxmedical.com

Detailed Description

This study will compare the quality of fat tissue collected using different liposuction technologies and aspiration methods. Participants will have paired samples of fat tissue collected from similar areas of the body during their planned liposuction procedure. Each participant will serve as their own comparison. The study will evaluate the viability and characteristics of the collected fat tissue, including the number of viable fat cells, the types and number of cells present in the tissue, metabolic activity, and the composition of the collected tissue. The study will compare these characteristics between the different liposuction technologies and aspiration methods. The goal of this study is to better understand how different liposuction technologies and aspiration methods affect the quality and characteristics of harvested fat tissue. Participants are not expected to receive any direct clinical benefit from participating in the study beyond that associated with their planned liposuction procedure.

Notice

Study information shown on this site is derived from ClinicalTrials.gov (a public registry operated by the National Institutes of Health). The listing of studies provided is not certain to be all studies for which you might be eligible. Furthermore, study eligibility requirements can be difficult to understand and may change over time, so it is wise to speak with your medical care provider and individual research study teams when making decisions related to participation.